Forecast & Tricast Greyhound Bets: How They Work & Pay Out

Straight forecast, reverse forecast, and tricast bets explained for greyhound racing. Calculation methods, examples, and when to use each.


Updated: April 2026

Punter studying a greyhound racecard before placing a forecast bet at a UK track

Best Greyhound Betting Sites – Bet on Greyhounds in 2026

Loading...

Beyond the Win Bet

If you’re only betting on winners, you’re leaving value on the table. Win bets are clean and simple — pick the first dog past the post, collect your payout. But greyhound racing, with its six-dog fields and frequent upsets, is built for more complex wagers. Forecast and tricast bets let you express an opinion about the order of finish, not just the winner, and they pay accordingly.

The appeal is obvious. A straight forecast on two dogs at medium odds can return significantly more than a single win bet on either of them individually. A tricast — predicting the first three in exact order — can produce dividends that dwarf any standard market. The catch is equally obvious: these bets are harder to land. Predicting the winner of a six-dog race is one challenge. Predicting the first two in exact order is exponentially harder. Predicting the first three is harder still.

That difficulty is precisely why forecasts and tricasts deserve attention. The dividends they produce often overcompensate for the difficulty of landing them, especially in races where the form points strongly towards one or two likely contenders. The trick is knowing when the conditions suit this kind of bet and when they don’t.

Straight Forecast: First and Second in Order

A straight forecast requires precision — but pays for it. You name the dog you think will finish first and the dog you think will finish second, in that exact order. If dog A wins and dog B finishes second, you collect. If dog B wins and dog A finishes second, you lose. The order matters.

Forecast dividends in greyhound racing are calculated by the Tote pool system (for pool bets) or by the bookmaker’s own computer straight forecast system (CSF) for fixed-odds bets. The CSF dividend is calculated after the race based on the starting prices of the first two finishers. This means you don’t know your exact payout when you place the bet — you know it will be higher than a simple win bet, but the precise figure depends on the odds of both dogs at the off.

As a rough guide, a straight forecast combining the 2/1 favourite with a 5/1 second favourite might return somewhere in the range of 15/1 to 20/1. A forecast combining two outsiders could return 50/1 or more. These figures vary with every race, but the principle holds: the less obvious the combination, the higher the payout.

The practical skill behind a good straight forecast isn’t just identifying the likely winner. It’s identifying the likely runner-up. In a six-dog field, the runner-up position is often the most contested — three or four dogs might have a realistic chance of finishing second behind the favourite. Your edge comes from narrowing that field of contenders using form analysis, trap draw, and running style. If you can confidently eliminate two or three dogs from the runner-up picture, your straight forecast becomes a much more targeted bet.

One common approach is to identify the probable winner through form, then look at which dogs are likely to benefit from the race dynamics. If the likely winner is a front-running railer, the dog that typically finishes behind front-runners — a strong closer drawn wide, for example — might be the best forecast companion, even if it wouldn’t be your pick to win outright.

Reverse and Combination Forecasts

When you’re confident in two dogs but not their order, reverse forecasts make sense. A reverse forecast is simply two straight forecasts combined: one with dog A first and dog B second, and the other with dog B first and dog A second. Because you’re placing two bets, your stake is doubled — a £1 reverse forecast costs £2 — but you win regardless of which order the two dogs finish in, provided they fill the first two places.

The return on a reverse forecast is the dividend of whichever combination actually happens. If dog A wins and dog B finishes second, you’re paid the straight forecast dividend for that specific order. The other half of your bet (dog B first, dog A second) is a loser. So while the reverse forecast gives you flexibility, it also means you’re only collecting on one of your two bets. The effective return per pound staked is half the straight forecast dividend, minus the losing half of your stake.

Combination forecasts extend this logic to more than two dogs. If you fancy three dogs — A, B, and C — to fill the first two places but don’t know the order, a combination forecast covers all six possible permutations: A-B, A-C, B-A, B-C, C-A, C-B. That’s six straight forecasts, so a £1 unit stake costs £6 total. You win if any two of your three selected dogs finish first and second in any order.

Combination forecasts are useful in races where you have a clear shortlist of likely contenders but can’t separate them with confidence. The cost per bet rises quickly with each added selection — four dogs produce 12 permutations, five dogs produce 20 — so it’s important to keep your selections tight. A combination forecast with five dogs is rarely good value because the dividend you receive is unlikely to offset the high cost of covering all those permutations.

The sweet spot for combination forecasts in greyhound racing is three selections. Three dogs, six permutations, manageable cost. If you’re routinely going above three selections, you’re probably not reading the race sharply enough, and your stake is diluting your potential profit.

Tricast and Combination Tricast Bets

Picking the first three in order is hard — combination tricasts lower the bar. A straight tricast requires you to name the first, second, and third finishers in exact order. In a six-dog race, there are 120 possible permutations for the first three places. Getting it exactly right is, statistically, a long shot. But the dividends reflect that difficulty, often running into triple figures from modest stakes.

A combination tricast lets you select three or more dogs and covers every possible order in which they might fill the first three places. Three dogs produce six tricast permutations. Four dogs produce 24. Five dogs produce 60. At a £1 unit stake, a four-dog combination tricast costs £24. The maths gets expensive quickly, and it’s easy to reach a point where the cost of covering all permutations exceeds any realistic dividend.

For practical purposes, the three-dog straight combination tricast — six permutations at your chosen unit stake — is the most commonly used and most manageable form of this bet. You identify three dogs that you expect to fill the first three places, accept that you don’t know the exact order, and let the combination do the work. If all three dogs finish in the top three, you collect the tricast dividend for whichever order they actually finished in.

Tricast dividends vary wildly depending on the starting prices of the three finishers. If the first three finishers are the three shortest-priced dogs in the race, the tricast dividend might be modest — perhaps 30/1 to 50/1. If an outsider creeps into the first three, the dividend can explode. This variability is both the appeal and the risk: you might land a combination tricast and receive a solid return, or you might receive a disappointingly low payout if the race goes to form.

When Forecasts and Tricasts Offer Real Value

The best forecast opportunities come in races with a clear frontrunner and an open battle for second. That’s the pattern to watch for. When the racecard presents one dog with obviously superior form and then four or five others that are closely matched, the win market is likely to offer cramped odds on the favourite while the forecast and tricast markets offer a way to lever your opinion about the wider race dynamics.

Conversely, forecasts and tricasts are poor value in races where the entire field looks open. If six dogs are genuinely hard to separate, the number of permutations you’d need to cover makes any structured forecast bet expensive relative to its likely return. In these races, a simple win or each-way bet on your best fancy is often the sharper play.

There’s also a timing consideration. Forecast and tricast bets work best in graded races where you have reliable, recent form data for every runner. In open races or competition heats, where dogs from different tracks and different grades are meeting for the first time, the predictability drops and the risk of a completely unexpected finishing order rises. Save your forecast bets for the meetings where you have the deepest knowledge, and the races will reward the precision.